Cabo Verde vs Kyrgyzstan: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Cabo Verde
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 244.6 2015 = 100 against 232.3 2015 = 100 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 12.3 2015 = 100.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 204 countries.
Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 113.02 2015 = 100 | 54.98 2015 = 100 | 58.04 2015 = 100 | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 155.45 2015 = 100 | 110.55 2015 = 100 | 44.9 2015 = 100 | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 220.76 2015 = 100 | 173.7 2015 = 100 | 47.06 2015 = 100 | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Cabo Verde or Kyrgyzstan?
- Cabo Verde, at 244.6 2015 = 100 against 232.3 2015 = 100 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Cabo Verde and Kyrgyzstan?
- 12.3 2015 = 100, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Kyrgyzstan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Cabo Verde and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for import volume index?
- Cabo Verde ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.