Cape Verde vs Mongolia: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Cape Verde
- Mongolia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 244.6 2015 = 100 against 230.3 2015 = 100 in Mongolia, a difference of 14.3 2015 = 100.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 7th and Mongolia ranks 10th of 204 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 113.02 2015 = 100 | 55.9 2015 = 100 | 57.12 2015 = 100 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 155.45 2015 = 100 | 123.55 2015 = 100 | 31.9 2015 = 100 | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 220.76 2015 = 100 | 171.64 2015 = 100 | 49.12 2015 = 100 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Cape Verde or Mongolia?
- Cape Verde, at 244.6 2015 = 100 against 230.3 2015 = 100 in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Cape Verde and Mongolia?
- 14.3 2015 = 100, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Mongolia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Cape Verde and Mongolia rank globally for import volume index?
- Cape Verde ranks 7th and Mongolia ranks 10th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.