Cayman Islands vs Slovenia: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Cayman Islands
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 183.2 2015 = 100 against 170.7 2015 = 100 in Cayman Islands, a difference of 12.5 2015 = 100.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Cayman Islands's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cayman Islands ahead.
Cayman Islands ranks 21st and Slovenia ranks 19th of 204 countries.
Cayman Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cayman Islands | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 132.64 2015 = 100 | 90 2015 = 100 | 42.64 2015 = 100 | Cayman Islands |
| 2010s | 106.53 2015 = 100 | 103.13 2015 = 100 | 3.4 2015 = 100 | Cayman Islands |
| 2020s | 151.44 2015 = 100 | 151.08 2015 = 100 | 0.36 2015 = 100 | Cayman Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Cayman Islands or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 183.2 2015 = 100 against 170.7 2015 = 100 in Cayman Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Cayman Islands and Slovenia?
- 12.5 2015 = 100, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cayman Islands and Slovenia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Cayman Islands and Slovenia rank globally for import volume index?
- Cayman Islands ranks 21st and Slovenia ranks 19th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.