Chad vs Cuba: Import volume index

Chad
47.6 2015 = 100
in 2024
Cuba
51.6 2015 = 100
in 2024
Chad rank
196th
Cuba rank
195th

Import volume index over time

  • Chad
  • Cuba
406080100120200520142024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 51.6 2015 = 100 against 47.6 2015 = 100 in Chad, a difference of 4 2015 = 100.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cuba ahead.

Chad ranks 196th and Cuba ranks 195th of 204 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Cuba Difference Ahead
2000s 46.1 2015 = 100 94.04 2015 = 100 47.94 2015 = 100 Cuba
2010s 71.2 2015 = 100 94.28 2015 = 100 23.08 2015 = 100 Cuba
2020s 43.48 2015 = 100 56.02 2015 = 100 12.54 2015 = 100 Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import volume index, Chad or Cuba?
Cuba, at 51.6 2015 = 100 against 47.6 2015 = 100 in Chad as of 2024.
What is the difference in import volume index between Chad and Cuba?
4 2015 = 100, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Cuba?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Chad and Cuba rank globally for import volume index?
Chad ranks 196th and Cuba ranks 195th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.