Comoros vs French Polynesia: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Comoros
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 122.9 2015 = 100 against 121.9 2015 = 100 in French Polynesia, a difference of 1 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was French Polynesia ahead.
Comoros ranks 87th and French Polynesia ranks 90th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 2 and French Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.52 2015 = 100 | 127.88 2015 = 100 | 54.36 2015 = 100 | French Polynesia |
| 2010s | 110.99 2015 = 100 | 106.45 2015 = 100 | 4.54 2015 = 100 | Comoros |
| 2020s | 123.74 2015 = 100 | 117.74 2015 = 100 | 6 2015 = 100 | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Comoros or French Polynesia?
- Comoros, at 122.9 2015 = 100 against 121.9 2015 = 100 in French Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Comoros and French Polynesia?
- 1 2015 = 100, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and French Polynesia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Comoros and French Polynesia rank globally for import volume index?
- Comoros ranks 87th and French Polynesia ranks 90th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.