Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Congo
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Congo currently reports 38.7 2015 = 100 against 35.2 2015 = 100 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3.5 2015 = 100.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Congo ranks 202nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 203rd of 204 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.14 2015 = 100 | 99.92 2015 = 100 | 67.78 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 64.92 2015 = 100 | 119.83 2015 = 100 | 54.91 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 27.3 2015 = 100 | 39.98 2015 = 100 | 12.68 2015 = 100 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
- Congo, at 38.7 2015 = 100 against 35.2 2015 = 100 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 3.5 2015 = 100, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for import volume index?
- Congo ranks 202nd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 203rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.