Curacao vs Eswatini: Import volume index

Curacao
105.8 2015 = 100
in 2024
Eswatini
105.4 2015 = 100
in 2024
Curacao rank
131st
Eswatini rank
134th

Import volume index over time

  • Curacao
  • Eswatini
050100150200520142024

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 105.8 2015 = 100 against 105.4 2015 = 100 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.4 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Eswatini ahead.

Curacao ranks 131st and Eswatini ranks 134th of 204 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Eswatini Difference Ahead
2010s 99.64 2015 = 100 110.3 2015 = 100 10.66 2015 = 100 Eswatini
2020s 93.94 2015 = 100 107.32 2015 = 100 13.38 2015 = 100 Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import volume index, Curacao or Eswatini?
Curacao, at 105.8 2015 = 100 against 105.4 2015 = 100 in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in import volume index between Curacao and Eswatini?
0.4 2015 = 100, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Eswatini?
14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Curacao and Eswatini rank globally for import volume index?
Curacao ranks 131st and Eswatini ranks 134th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.