Denmark vs Hong Kong (China): Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Denmark
- Hong Kong (China)
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 97.7 2015 = 100 against 97.7 2015 = 100 in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 0 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 146th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 146th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong (China) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Hong Kong (China) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 112.02 2015 = 100 | 77.38 2015 = 100 | 34.64 2015 = 100 | Denmark |
| 2010s | 100.22 2015 = 100 | 100.94 2015 = 100 | 0.72 2015 = 100 | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2020s | 101.88 2015 = 100 | 101.46 2015 = 100 | 0.42 2015 = 100 | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Denmark or Hong Kong (China)?
- Denmark, at 97.7 2015 = 100 against 97.7 2015 = 100 in Hong Kong (China) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Denmark and Hong Kong (China)?
- 0 2015 = 100, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Hong Kong (China)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for import volume index?
- Denmark ranks 146th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 146th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.