Ecuador vs Guam: Import volume index

Ecuador
106.1 2015 = 100
in 2024
Guam
106.5 2015 = 100
in 2024
Ecuador rank
130th
Guam rank
128th

Import volume index over time

  • Ecuador
  • Guam
050100150200520142024

How they compare

Guam currently reports 106.5 2015 = 100 against 106.1 2015 = 100 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.4 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guam ahead.

Ecuador ranks 130th and Guam ranks 128th of 204 countries.

Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Guam Difference Ahead
2000s 73.06 2015 = 100 135.9 2015 = 100 62.84 2015 = 100 Guam
2010s 103.18 2015 = 100 115.17 2015 = 100 11.99 2015 = 100 Guam
2020s 103.12 2015 = 100 117.78 2015 = 100 14.66 2015 = 100 Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import volume index, Ecuador or Guam?
Guam, at 106.5 2015 = 100 against 106.1 2015 = 100 in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in import volume index between Ecuador and Guam?
0.4 2015 = 100, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Guam?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Guam rank globally for import volume index?
Ecuador ranks 130th and Guam ranks 128th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.