El Salvador vs Macao: Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Import volume index (2015 = 100) over time
- El Salvador
- Macao
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 121.7 2015 = 100 against 119.7 2015 = 100 in Macao, a difference of 2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 91st and Macao ranks 94th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Macao in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.88 2015 = 100 | 53.1 2015 = 100 | 32.78 2015 = 100 | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 95.58 2015 = 100 | 85.87 2015 = 100 | 9.71 2015 = 100 | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 116.32 2015 = 100 | 127.84 2015 = 100 | 11.52 2015 = 100 | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, El Salvador or Macao?
- El Salvador, at 121.7 2015 = 100 against 119.7 2015 = 100 in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between El Salvador and Macao?
- 2 2015 = 100, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Macao?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Macao rank globally for import volume index?
- El Salvador ranks 91st and Macao ranks 94th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.