Eritrea vs North Korea: Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Import volume index (2015 = 100) over time
- Eritrea
- North Korea
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 44.4 2015 = 100 against 42.2 2015 = 100 in North Korea, a difference of 2.2 2015 = 100.
That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times North Korea's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Korea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 199th and North Korea ranks 201st of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 2 and North Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | North Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.88 2015 = 100 | 71.88 2015 = 100 | 14 2015 = 100 | North Korea |
| 2010s | 85.62 2015 = 100 | 79.68 2015 = 100 | 5.94 2015 = 100 | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 37.24 2015 = 100 | 27.38 2015 = 100 | 9.86 2015 = 100 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Eritrea or North Korea?
- Eritrea, at 44.4 2015 = 100 against 42.2 2015 = 100 in North Korea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Eritrea and North Korea?
- 2.2 2015 = 100, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and North Korea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and North Korea rank globally for import volume index?
- Eritrea ranks 199th and North Korea ranks 201st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.