Fiji vs Malawi: Import volume index

Fiji
117.4 2015 = 100
in 2024
Malawi
116.1 2015 = 100
in 2024
Fiji rank
100th
Malawi rank
103rd

Import volume index over time

  • Fiji
  • Malawi
050100150200520142024

How they compare

Fiji currently reports 117.4 2015 = 100 against 116.1 2015 = 100 in Malawi, a difference of 1.3 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Fiji ahead.

Fiji ranks 100th and Malawi ranks 103rd of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Fiji Malawi Difference Ahead
2000s 93.44 2015 = 100 75.02 2015 = 100 18.42 2015 = 100 Fiji
2010s 110.3 2015 = 100 106.91 2015 = 100 3.39 2015 = 100 Fiji
2020s 100.9 2015 = 100 101.44 2015 = 100 0.54 2015 = 100 Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import volume index, Fiji or Malawi?
Fiji, at 117.4 2015 = 100 against 116.1 2015 = 100 in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in import volume index between Fiji and Malawi?
1.3 2015 = 100, with Fiji ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Malawi?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Fiji and Malawi rank globally for import volume index?
Fiji ranks 100th and Malawi ranks 103rd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.