Gibraltar vs Japan: Import volume index

Gibraltar
99.7 2015 = 100
in 2024
Japan
102.2 2015 = 100
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
144th
Japan rank
141st

Import volume index over time

  • Gibraltar
  • Japan
050100150200520142024

How they compare

Japan currently reports 102.2 2015 = 100 against 99.7 2015 = 100 in Gibraltar, a difference of 2.5 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Japan ahead.

Gibraltar ranks 144th and Japan ranks 141st of 204 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gibraltar Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 79.14 2015 = 100 88.34 2015 = 100 9.2 2015 = 100 Japan
2010s 87.36 2015 = 100 98.46 2015 = 100 11.1 2015 = 100 Japan
2020s 99.54 2015 = 100 103.38 2015 = 100 3.84 2015 = 100 Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import volume index, Gibraltar or Japan?
Japan, at 102.2 2015 = 100 against 99.7 2015 = 100 in Gibraltar as of 2024.
What is the difference in import volume index between Gibraltar and Japan?
2.5 2015 = 100, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Japan?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Gibraltar and Japan rank globally for import volume index?
Gibraltar ranks 144th and Japan ranks 141st of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.