Greenland vs Zimbabwe: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Greenland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 123.5 2015 = 100 against 123.1 2015 = 100 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.4 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Greenland ahead.
Greenland ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 204 countries.
Greenland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 115.52 2015 = 100 | 60.82 2015 = 100 | 54.7 2015 = 100 | Greenland |
| 2010s | 118.42 2015 = 100 | 100.47 2015 = 100 | 17.95 2015 = 100 | Greenland |
| 2020s | 136.42 2015 = 100 | 108.14 2015 = 100 | 28.28 2015 = 100 | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Greenland or Zimbabwe?
- Greenland, at 123.5 2015 = 100 against 123.1 2015 = 100 in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Greenland and Zimbabwe?
- 0.4 2015 = 100, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Zimbabwe?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Greenland and Zimbabwe rank globally for import volume index?
- Greenland ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.