Iceland vs India: Import volume index

Iceland
138 2015 = 100
in 2024
India
139 2015 = 100
in 2024
Iceland rank
57th
India rank
55th

Import volume index over time

  • Iceland
  • India
5075100125150200520142024

How they compare

India currently reports 139 2015 = 100 against 138 2015 = 100 in Iceland, a difference of 1 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 57th and India ranks 55th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and India in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland India Difference Ahead
2000s 103.46 2015 = 100 50.86 2015 = 100 52.6 2015 = 100 Iceland
2010s 95.94 2015 = 100 98.78 2015 = 100 2.84 2015 = 100 India
2020s 125.3 2015 = 100 118.7 2015 = 100 6.6 2015 = 100 Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import volume index, Iceland or India?
India, at 139 2015 = 100 against 138 2015 = 100 in Iceland as of 2024.
What is the difference in import volume index between Iceland and India?
1 2015 = 100, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and India?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Iceland and India rank globally for import volume index?
Iceland ranks 57th and India ranks 55th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.