Kenya vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Kenya
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 102.9 2015 = 100 against 101.3 2015 = 100 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 1.6 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Kenya ranks 140th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 143rd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.32 2015 = 100 | 95.06 2015 = 100 | 39.74 2015 = 100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 93.62 2015 = 100 | 91.95 2015 = 100 | 1.67 2015 = 100 | Kenya |
| 2020s | 98.86 2015 = 100 | 89.52 2015 = 100 | 9.34 2015 = 100 | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Kenya or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Kenya, at 102.9 2015 = 100 against 101.3 2015 = 100 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Kenya and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 1.6 2015 = 100, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for import volume index?
- Kenya ranks 140th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 143rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.