Kyrgyzstan vs Mongolia: Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Import volume index (2015 = 100) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 232.3 2015 = 100 against 230.3 2015 = 100 in Mongolia, a difference of 2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mongolia ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Mongolia ranks 10th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.98 2015 = 100 | 55.9 2015 = 100 | 0.92 2015 = 100 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 110.55 2015 = 100 | 123.55 2015 = 100 | 13 2015 = 100 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 173.7 2015 = 100 | 171.64 2015 = 100 | 2.06 2015 = 100 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Kyrgyzstan or Mongolia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 232.3 2015 = 100 against 230.3 2015 = 100 in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 2 2015 = 100, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia rank globally for import volume index?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 8th and Mongolia ranks 10th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.