Lebanon vs Nauru: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Lebanon
- Nauru
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 66.7 2015 = 100 against 62.4 2015 = 100 in Nauru, a difference of 4.3 2015 = 100.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Nauru's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 187th and Nauru ranks 190th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.66 2015 = 100 | 50.62 2015 = 100 | 20.04 2015 = 100 | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 99.23 2015 = 100 | 72.97 2015 = 100 | 26.26 2015 = 100 | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 66 2015 = 100 | 80.18 2015 = 100 | 14.18 2015 = 100 | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Lebanon or Nauru?
- Lebanon, at 66.7 2015 = 100 against 62.4 2015 = 100 in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Lebanon and Nauru?
- 4.3 2015 = 100, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Nauru?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and Nauru rank globally for import volume index?
- Lebanon ranks 187th and Nauru ranks 190th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.