Luxembourg vs New Caledonia: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Luxembourg
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 68.5 2015 = 100 against 68.1 2015 = 100 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.4 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 183rd and New Caledonia ranks 184th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 118.6 2015 = 100 | 89.5 2015 = 100 | 29.1 2015 = 100 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 98.66 2015 = 100 | 99.91 2015 = 100 | 1.25 2015 = 100 | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 78.44 2015 = 100 | 87.88 2015 = 100 | 9.44 2015 = 100 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Luxembourg or New Caledonia?
- Luxembourg, at 68.5 2015 = 100 against 68.1 2015 = 100 in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 0.4 2015 = 100, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and New Caledonia rank globally for import volume index?
- Luxembourg ranks 183rd and New Caledonia ranks 184th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.