Macao vs Tonga: Import volume index

Macao
119.7 2015 = 100
in 2024
Tonga
119.4 2015 = 100
in 2024
Macao rank
94th
Tonga rank
96th

Import volume index over time

  • Macao
  • Tonga
5075100125150200520142024

How they compare

Macao currently reports 119.7 2015 = 100 against 119.4 2015 = 100 in Tonga, a difference of 0.3 2015 = 100.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tonga ahead.

Macao ranks 94th and Tonga ranks 96th of 204 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 53.1 2015 = 100 60.44 2015 = 100 7.34 2015 = 100 Tonga
2010s 85.87 2015 = 100 92.96 2015 = 100 7.09 2015 = 100 Tonga
2020s 127.84 2015 = 100 110.54 2015 = 100 17.3 2015 = 100 Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher import volume index, Macao or Tonga?
Macao, at 119.7 2015 = 100 against 119.4 2015 = 100 in Tonga as of 2024.
What is the difference in import volume index between Macao and Tonga?
0.3 2015 = 100, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Tonga?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Macao and Tonga rank globally for import volume index?
Macao ranks 94th and Tonga ranks 96th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Import volume index (2015 = 100)
Unit
2015 = 100
Source
UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
205 places, 4,078 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.