New Zealand vs Oman: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- New Zealand
- Oman
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 118.4 2015 = 100 against 118.2 2015 = 100 in Oman, a difference of 0.2 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 97th and Oman ranks 98th of 204 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.12 2015 = 100 | 53.3 2015 = 100 | 18.82 2015 = 100 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 96.3 2015 = 100 | 84.37 2015 = 100 | 11.93 2015 = 100 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 120.44 2015 = 100 | 100.52 2015 = 100 | 19.92 2015 = 100 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, New Zealand or Oman?
- New Zealand, at 118.4 2015 = 100 against 118.2 2015 = 100 in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between New Zealand and Oman?
- 0.2 2015 = 100, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Oman?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Oman rank globally for import volume index?
- New Zealand ranks 97th and Oman ranks 98th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.