Pakistan vs Rwanda: Import volume index
Import volume index over time
- Pakistan
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 205.5 2015 = 100 against 196.6 2015 = 100 in Pakistan, a difference of 8.9 2015 = 100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 204 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 105.52 2015 = 100 | 35.06 2015 = 100 | 70.46 2015 = 100 | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 117.23 2015 = 100 | 91.44 2015 = 100 | 25.79 2015 = 100 | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 193.26 2015 = 100 | 157.06 2015 = 100 | 36.2 2015 = 100 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher import volume index, Pakistan or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 205.5 2015 = 100 against 196.6 2015 = 100 in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in import volume index between Pakistan and Rwanda?
- 8.9 2015 = 100, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Rwanda rank globally for import volume index?
- Pakistan ranks 15th and Rwanda ranks 13th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), published as Import volume index (2015 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Import volume indexes are derived from UNCTAD's volume index series and are the ratio of the import value indexes to the corresponding unit value indexes. Unit value indexes are based on data reported by countries that demonstrate consistency under UNCTAD quality controls, supplemented by UNCTAD's estimates using the previous year's trade values at the Standard International Trade Classification three-digit level as weights.