East Asia & Pacific vs Sweden: International tourism, expenditures
International tourism, expenditures over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 7.1% against 4.6% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.5 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 35th of 47 groups.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.8% | 9.0% | 2.2% | Sweden |
| 2000s | 5.8% | 7.9% | 2.0% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 4.9% | 7.1% | 2.2% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher international tourism, expenditures, East Asia & Pacific or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 7.1% against 4.6% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2010.
- What is the difference in international tourism, expenditures between East Asia & Pacific and Sweden?
- 2.5%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Sweden?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2010.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Sweden rank globally for international tourism, expenditures?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 38th and Sweden ranks 35th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Yearbook of Tourism Statistics, Compendium of Tourism Statistics and data files, UN Tourism, published as International tourism, expenditures (% of total imports). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
International tourism expenditures are expenditures of international outbound visitors in other countries, including payments to foreign carriers for international transport. These expenditures may include those by residents traveling abroad as same-day visitors, except in cases where these are important enough to justify separate classification. For some countries they do not include expenditures for passenger transport items. Their share in imports is calculated as a ratio to imports of goods and services, which comprise all transactions between residents of a country and the rest of the world involving a change of ownership from nonresidents to residents of general merchandise, goods sent for processing and repairs, nonmonetary gold, and services.