Cape Verde vs Congo: International tourism, number of arrivals
International tourism, number of arrivals over time
- Cape Verde
- Congo
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 180,000 against 158,000 in Congo, a difference of 22,000.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 160th and Congo ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher international tourism, number of arrivals, Cape Verde or Congo?
- Cape Verde, at 180,000 against 158,000 in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in international tourism, number of arrivals between Cape Verde and Congo?
- 22,000, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Congo?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Cape Verde and Congo rank globally for international tourism, number of arrivals?
- Cape Verde ranks 160th and Congo ranks 163rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Yearbook of Tourism Statistics, Compendium of Tourism Statistics and data files, UN Tourism, published as International tourism, number of arrivals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
International inbound tourists (overnight visitors) are the number of tourists who travel to a country other than that in which they have their usual residence, but outside their usual environment, for a period not exceeding 12 months and whose main purpose in visiting is other than an activity remunerated from within the country visited. When data on number of tourists are not available, the number of visitors, which includes tourists, same-day visitors, cruise passengers, and crew members, is shown instead. Sources and collection methods for arrivals differ across countries. In some cases data are from border statistics (police, immigration, and the like) and supplemented by border surveys. In other cases data are from tourism accommodation establishments. For some countries number of arrivals is limited to arrivals by air and for others to arrivals staying in hotels. Some countries include arrivals of nationals residing abroad while others do not. Caution should thus be used in comparing arrivals across countries. The data on inbound tourists refer to the number of arrivals, not to the number of people traveling. Thus a person who makes several trips to a country during a given period is counted each time as a new arrival.