Hong Kong, China vs Viet Nam: International tourism, number of arrivals

Hong Kong, China
3.57 million
in 2020
Viet Nam
3.84 million
in 2020
Hong Kong, China rank
49th
Viet Nam rank
47th

International tourism, number of arrivals over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Viet Nam
020.0M40.0M60.0M199520072020

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 3.84 million against 3.57 million in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 268,000.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 49th and Viet Nam ranks 47th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Viet Nam in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1990s 11.19 million 1.60 million 9.59 million Hong Kong, China
2000s 21.66 million 3.17 million 18.48 million Hong Kong, China
2010s 53.72 million 9.77 million 43.95 million Hong Kong, China
2020s 3.57 million 3.84 million 268,000 Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher international tourism, number of arrivals, Hong Kong, China or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 3.84 million against 3.57 million in Hong Kong, China as of 2020.
What is the difference in international tourism, number of arrivals between Hong Kong, China and Viet Nam?
268,000, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Viet Nam?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Hong Kong, China and Viet Nam rank globally for international tourism, number of arrivals?
Hong Kong, China ranks 49th and Viet Nam ranks 47th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Yearbook of Tourism Statistics, Compendium of Tourism Statistics and data files, UN Tourism, published as International tourism, number of arrivals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Viet Nam: International tourism, number of arrivals. Statizoid, drawing on Yearbook of Tourism Statistics, Compendium of Tourism Statistics and data files, UN Tourism. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/international-tourism-number-of-arrivals/hong-kong-sar-china/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/international-tourism-number-of-arrivals/hong-kong-sar-china/viet-nam/">Hong Kong, China vs Viet Nam: International tourism, number of arrivals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
International tourism, number of arrivals
Source
Yearbook of Tourism Statistics, Compendium of Tourism Statistics and data files, UN Tourism
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
247 places, 5,775 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

International inbound tourists (overnight visitors) are the number of tourists who travel to a country other than that in which they have their usual residence, but outside their usual environment, for a period not exceeding 12 months and whose main purpose in visiting is other than an activity remunerated from within the country visited. When data on number of tourists are not available, the number of visitors, which includes tourists, same-day visitors, cruise passengers, and crew members, is shown instead. Sources and collection methods for arrivals differ across countries. In some cases data are from border statistics (police, immigration, and the like) and supplemented by border surveys. In other cases data are from tourism accommodation establishments. For some countries number of arrivals is limited to arrivals by air and for others to arrivals staying in hotels. Some countries include arrivals of nationals residing abroad while others do not. Caution should thus be used in comparing arrivals across countries. The data on inbound tourists refer to the number of arrivals, not to the number of people traveling. Thus a person who makes several trips to a country during a given period is counted each time as a new arrival.