Chile vs Japan: Lead time to import, median case
Lead time to import, median case over time
- Chile
- Japan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 3 days against 3 days in Japan, a difference of 0 days.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 34th and Japan ranks 34th of 75 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.2 days | 2.7 days | 0.5 days | Chile |
| 2010s | 2.26 days | 1.75 days | 0.51 days | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lead time to import, median case, Chile or Japan?
- Chile, at 3 days against 3 days in Japan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in lead time to import, median case between Chile and Japan?
- 0 days, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Japan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Chile and Japan rank globally for lead time to import, median case?
- Chile ranks 34th and Japan ranks 34th of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Logistic Performance Index Surveys, World Bank (WB), published as Lead time to import, median case (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Lead time to import is the median time (the value for 50 percent of shipments) from port of discharge to arrival at the consignee. Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey. Respondents provided separate values for the best case (10 percent of shipments) and the median case (50 percent of shipments). The data are exponentiated averages of the logarithm of single value responses and of midpoint values of range responses for the median case.