China vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Lead time to import, median case

China
6 days
in 2018
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
6.76 days
in 2018
China rank
6th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
3rd

Lead time to import, median case over time

  • China
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2.557.51012.5200720122018

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) currently reports 6.76 days against 6 days in China, a difference of 0.76 days.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s figure about 1.1 times China's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has been ahead every year.

China ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd of 75 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 3.8 days 11.11 days 7.31 days Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2010s 4.11 days 7.82 days 3.71 days Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher lead time to import, median case, China or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), at 6.76 days against 6 days in China as of 2018.
What is the difference in lead time to import, median case between China and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
0.76 days, with Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do China and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for lead time to import, median case?
China ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 3rd of 75 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Logistic Performance Index Surveys, World Bank (WB), published as Lead time to import, median case (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Lead time to import, median case. Statizoid, drawing on Logistic Performance Index Surveys, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/lead-time-to-import-median-case-days/china/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/lead-time-to-import-median-case-days/china/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">China vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Lead time to import, median case</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Lead time to import, median case (days)
Unit
days
Source
Logistic Performance Index Surveys, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
120 places, 688 data points, 2007–2018
Last refreshed

Lead time to import is the median time (the value for 50 percent of shipments) from port of discharge to arrival at the consignee. Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey. Respondents provided separate values for the best case (10 percent of shipments) and the median case (50 percent of shipments). The data are exponentiated averages of the logarithm of single value responses and of midpoint values of range responses for the median case.