Ecuador vs South Africa: Lead time to import, median case
Lead time to import, median case over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 3 days against 3 days in South Africa, a difference of 0 days.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 34th of 75 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.9 days | 4 days | 4.9 days | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 3.6 days | 2.81 days | 0.79 days | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lead time to import, median case, Ecuador or South Africa?
- Ecuador, at 3 days against 3 days in South Africa as of 2016.
- What is the difference in lead time to import, median case between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 0 days, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for lead time to import, median case?
- Ecuador ranks 34th and South Africa ranks 34th of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Logistic Performance Index Surveys, World Bank (WB), published as Lead time to import, median case (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Lead time to import is the median time (the value for 50 percent of shipments) from port of discharge to arrival at the consignee. Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey. Respondents provided separate values for the best case (10 percent of shipments) and the median case (50 percent of shipments). The data are exponentiated averages of the logarithm of single value responses and of midpoint values of range responses for the median case.