Hong Kong vs Panama: Lead time to import, median case
Lead time to import, median case over time
- Hong Kong
- Panama
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 2 days against 2 days in Panama, a difference of 0 days.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Panama ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 53rd and Panama ranks 53rd of 75 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.4 days | 4.9 days | 2.5 days | Panama |
| 2010s | 1.91 days | 2.6 days | 0.6975 days | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lead time to import, median case, Hong Kong or Panama?
- Hong Kong, at 2 days against 2 days in Panama as of 2018.
- What is the difference in lead time to import, median case between Hong Kong and Panama?
- 0 days, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Hong Kong and Panama rank globally for lead time to import, median case?
- Hong Kong ranks 53rd and Panama ranks 53rd of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Logistic Performance Index Surveys, World Bank (WB), published as Lead time to import, median case (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Lead time to import is the median time (the value for 50 percent of shipments) from port of discharge to arrival at the consignee. Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey. Respondents provided separate values for the best case (10 percent of shipments) and the median case (50 percent of shipments). The data are exponentiated averages of the logarithm of single value responses and of midpoint values of range responses for the median case.