Malaysia vs Panama: Lead time to import, median case
Lead time to import, median case over time
- Malaysia
- Panama
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 2 days against 2 days in Panama, a difference of 0 days.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Panama ahead.
Malaysia ranks 53rd and Panama ranks 53rd of 75 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3 days | 4.9 days | 1.6 days | Panama |
| 2010s | 3.44 days | 2.6 days | 0.835 days | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lead time to import, median case, Malaysia or Panama?
- Malaysia, at 2 days against 2 days in Panama as of 2018.
- What is the difference in lead time to import, median case between Malaysia and Panama?
- 0 days, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Malaysia and Panama rank globally for lead time to import, median case?
- Malaysia ranks 53rd and Panama ranks 53rd of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Logistic Performance Index Surveys, World Bank (WB), published as Lead time to import, median case (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Lead time to import is the median time (the value for 50 percent of shipments) from port of discharge to arrival at the consignee. Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey. Respondents provided separate values for the best case (10 percent of shipments) and the median case (50 percent of shipments). The data are exponentiated averages of the logarithm of single value responses and of midpoint values of range responses for the median case.