Namibia vs Sri Lanka: Lead time to import, median case
Lead time to import, median case over time
- Namibia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 4 days against 4 days in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 days.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 23rd and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 75 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 days | 2.5 days | 1.5 days | Namibia |
| 2010s | 3 days | 2.49 days | 0.51 days | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lead time to import, median case, Namibia or Sri Lanka?
- Namibia, at 4 days against 4 days in Sri Lanka as of 2018.
- What is the difference in lead time to import, median case between Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 0 days, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sri Lanka?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Namibia and Sri Lanka rank globally for lead time to import, median case?
- Namibia ranks 23rd and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 75 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Logistic Performance Index Surveys, World Bank (WB), published as Lead time to import, median case (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Lead time to import is the median time (the value for 50 percent of shipments) from port of discharge to arrival at the consignee. Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey. Respondents provided separate values for the best case (10 percent of shipments) and the median case (50 percent of shipments). The data are exponentiated averages of the logarithm of single value responses and of midpoint values of range responses for the median case.