Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Uganda: Lead time to import, median case
Lead time to import, median case over time
- Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 14 days against 6.76 days in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 7.24 days.
That makes Uganda's figure about 2.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Uganda ahead.
Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 3rd and Uganda ranks 1st of 43 groups.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.11 days | 14 days | 2.89 days | Uganda |
| 2010s | 8.66 days | 28.74 days | 20.08 days | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lead time to import, median case, Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 14 days against 6.76 days in Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2018.
- What is the difference in lead time to import, median case between Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uganda?
- 7.24 days, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) and Uganda rank globally for lead time to import, median case?
- Sub-Saharan Africa (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 3rd and Uganda ranks 1st of 43 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Logistic Performance Index Surveys, World Bank (WB), published as Lead time to import, median case (days). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Lead time to import is the median time (the value for 50 percent of shipments) from port of discharge to arrival at the consignee. Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey. Respondents provided separate values for the best case (10 percent of shipments) and the median case (50 percent of shipments). The data are exponentiated averages of the logarithm of single value responses and of midpoint values of range responses for the median case.