Comoros vs Panama: Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments

Comoros
2.93 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Panama
2.9 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Comoros rank
74th
Panama rank
75th

Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments over time

  • Comoros
  • Panama
0123200720142022

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 2.93 1=low to 5=high against 2.9 1=low to 5=high in Panama, a difference of 0.03 1=low to 5=high.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 74th and Panama ranks 75th of 156 countries.

Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 2.5 1=low to 5=high 2.93 1=low to 5=high 0.43 1=low to 5=high Panama
2010s 2.55 1=low to 5=high 3.19 1=low to 5=high 0.6459 1=low to 5=high Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: ability to track and trace consignments, Comoros or Panama?
Comoros, at 2.93 1=low to 5=high against 2.9 1=low to 5=high in Panama as of 2018.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: ability to track and trace consignments between Comoros and Panama?
0.03 1=low to 5=high, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Panama?
6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Comoros and Panama rank globally for logistics performance index: ability to track and trace consignments?
Comoros ranks 74th and Panama ranks 75th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Panama: Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-ability-to-track-and-trace-consignments-1-low-to-5-high/comoros/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-ability-to-track-and-trace-consignments-1-low-to-5-high/comoros/panama/">Comoros vs Panama: Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.