Cuba vs Mongolia: Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments

Cuba
2.4 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Mongolia
2.4 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Cuba rank
113th
Mongolia rank
113th

Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments over time

  • Cuba
  • Mongolia
00.511.522.5200720142022

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 2.4 1=low to 5=high against 2.4 1=low to 5=high in Mongolia, a difference of 0 1=low to 5=high.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Mongolia ahead.

Cuba ranks 113th and Mongolia ranks 113th of 156 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Mongolia Difference Ahead
2010s 2.15 1=low to 5=high 2.28 1=low to 5=high 0.1332 1=low to 5=high Mongolia
2020s 2.4 1=low to 5=high 2.4 1=low to 5=high 0 1=low to 5=high

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: ability to track and trace consignments, Cuba or Mongolia?
Cuba, at 2.4 1=low to 5=high against 2.4 1=low to 5=high in Mongolia as of 2022.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: ability to track and trace consignments between Cuba and Mongolia?
0 1=low to 5=high, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mongolia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Cuba and Mongolia rank globally for logistics performance index: ability to track and trace consignments?
Cuba ranks 113th and Mongolia ranks 113th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Mongolia: Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-ability-to-track-and-trace-consignments-1-low-to-5-high/cuba/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-ability-to-track-and-trace-consignments-1-low-to-5-high/cuba/mongolia/">Cuba vs Mongolia: Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.