Nepal vs Ukraine: Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments

Nepal
2.65 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Ukraine
2.6 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Nepal rank
101st
Ukraine rank
102nd

Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments over time

  • Nepal
  • Ukraine
0123200720142022

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 2.65 1=low to 5=high against 2.6 1=low to 5=high in Ukraine, a difference of 0.05 1=low to 5=high.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Ukraine has been ahead every year.

Nepal ranks 101st and Ukraine ranks 102nd of 156 countries.

Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 2.33 1=low to 5=high 2.53 1=low to 5=high 0.2 1=low to 5=high Ukraine
2010s 2.41 1=low to 5=high 2.98 1=low to 5=high 0.5724 1=low to 5=high Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: ability to track and trace consignments, Nepal or Ukraine?
Nepal, at 2.65 1=low to 5=high against 2.6 1=low to 5=high in Ukraine as of 2018.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: ability to track and trace consignments between Nepal and Ukraine?
0.05 1=low to 5=high, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Ukraine?
6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Nepal and Ukraine rank globally for logistics performance index: ability to track and trace consignments?
Nepal ranks 101st and Ukraine ranks 102nd of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Ukraine: Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-ability-to-track-and-trace-consignments-1-low-to-5-high/nepal/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-ability-to-track-and-trace-consignments-1-low-to-5-high/nepal/ukraine/">Nepal vs Ukraine: Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.