Congo vs Namibia: Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics

Congo
2.9 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Namibia
2.9 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Congo rank
66th
Namibia rank
66th

Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics over time

  • Congo
  • Namibia
0123200720142022

How they compare

Congo currently reports 2.9 1=low to 5=high against 2.9 1=low to 5=high in Namibia, a difference of 0 1=low to 5=high.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 66th and Namibia ranks 66th of 156 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 2.25 1=low to 5=high 2.5 1=low to 5=high 0.2521 1=low to 5=high Namibia
2020s 2.9 1=low to 5=high 2.9 1=low to 5=high 0 1=low to 5=high

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics, Congo or Namibia?
Congo, at 2.9 1=low to 5=high against 2.9 1=low to 5=high in Namibia as of 2022.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics between Congo and Namibia?
0 1=low to 5=high, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Namibia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Congo and Namibia rank globally for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics?
Congo ranks 66th and Namibia ranks 66th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Namibia: Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-competence-and-quality-of-logistics-services-1-low-to-5-high/congo-rep/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-competence-and-quality-of-logistics-services-1-low-to-5-high/congo-rep/namibia/">Congo vs Namibia: Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.