Lesotho vs Niger: Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics

Lesotho
2.03 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Niger
2.1 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Lesotho rank
150th
Niger rank
147th

Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics over time

  • Lesotho
  • Niger
00.511.522.5200720122018

How they compare

Niger currently reports 2.1 1=low to 5=high against 2.03 1=low to 5=high in Lesotho, a difference of 0.07 1=low to 5=high.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 150th and Niger ranks 147th of 156 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Niger in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 2.2 1=low to 5=high 2 1=low to 5=high 0.2 1=low to 5=high Lesotho
2010s 2.21 1=low to 5=high 2.34 1=low to 5=high 0.1313 1=low to 5=high Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics, Lesotho or Niger?
Niger, at 2.1 1=low to 5=high against 2.03 1=low to 5=high in Lesotho as of 2018.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics between Lesotho and Niger?
0.07 1=low to 5=high, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Niger?
5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Lesotho and Niger rank globally for logistics performance index: competence and quality of logistics?
Lesotho ranks 150th and Niger ranks 147th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Niger: Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-competence-and-quality-of-logistics-services-1-low-to-5-high/lesotho/niger/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-competence-and-quality-of-logistics-services-1-low-to-5-high/lesotho/niger/">Lesotho vs Niger: Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Competence and quality of logistics services (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.