Chad vs Nepal: Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced

Chad
2.37 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Nepal
2.36 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Chad rank
130th
Nepal rank
131st

Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced over time

  • Chad
  • Nepal
0123200720122018

How they compare

Chad currently reports 2.37 1=low to 5=high against 2.36 1=low to 5=high in Nepal, a difference of 0.01 1=low to 5=high.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Nepal ahead.

Chad ranks 130th and Nepal ranks 131st of 156 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 1.83 1=low to 5=high 2.09 1=low to 5=high 0.26 1=low to 5=high Nepal
2010s 2.37 1=low to 5=high 2.31 1=low to 5=high 0.0584 1=low to 5=high Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced, Chad or Nepal?
Chad, at 2.37 1=low to 5=high against 2.36 1=low to 5=high in Nepal as of 2018.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced between Chad and Nepal?
0.01 1=low to 5=high, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Nepal?
6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Chad and Nepal rank globally for logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced?
Chad ranks 130th and Nepal ranks 131st of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Nepal: Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-ease-of-arranging-competitively-priced-shipments-1-low-to-5/chad/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-ease-of-arranging-competitively-priced-shipments-1-low-to-5/chad/nepal/">Chad vs Nepal: Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.