Peru vs Qatar: Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced

Peru
3.1 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Qatar
3.1 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Peru rank
47th
Qatar rank
47th

Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced over time

  • Peru
  • Qatar
01234200720142022

How they compare

Peru currently reports 3.1 1=low to 5=high against 3.1 1=low to 5=high in Qatar, a difference of 0 1=low to 5=high.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Peru ranks 47th and Qatar ranks 47th of 156 countries.

Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 2.91 1=low to 5=high 3 1=low to 5=high 0.09 1=low to 5=high Qatar
2010s 2.86 1=low to 5=high 3.34 1=low to 5=high 0.4746 1=low to 5=high Qatar
2020s 3.1 1=low to 5=high 3.1 1=low to 5=high 0 1=low to 5=high

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced, Peru or Qatar?
Peru, at 3.1 1=low to 5=high against 3.1 1=low to 5=high in Qatar as of 2022.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced between Peru and Qatar?
0 1=low to 5=high, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Qatar?
7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
How do Peru and Qatar rank globally for logistics performance index: ease of arranging competitively priced?
Peru ranks 47th and Qatar ranks 47th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Qatar: Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-ease-of-arranging-competitively-priced-shipments-1-low-to-5/peru/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-ease-of-arranging-competitively-priced-shipments-1-low-to-5/peru/qatar/">Peru vs Qatar: Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Ease of arranging competitively priced shipments (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.