Botswana vs Chile: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process

Botswana
3 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Chile
3 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Botswana rank
46th
Chile rank
46th

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process over time

  • Botswana
  • Chile
0123200720142022

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 3 1=low to 5=high against 3 1=low to 5=high in Chile, a difference of 0 1=low to 5=high.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 46th and Chile ranks 46th of 156 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Chile Difference Ahead
2010s 2.59 1=low to 5=high 3.1 1=low to 5=high 0.5148 1=low to 5=high Chile
2020s 3 1=low to 5=high 3 1=low to 5=high 0 1=low to 5=high

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process, Botswana or Chile?
Botswana, at 3 1=low to 5=high against 3 1=low to 5=high in Chile as of 2022.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process between Botswana and Chile?
0 1=low to 5=high, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Chile?
5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Botswana and Chile rank globally for logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process?
Botswana ranks 46th and Chile ranks 46th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Chile: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/botswana/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/botswana/chile/">Botswana vs Chile: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.