Chad vs Myanmar: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process

Chad
2.15 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Myanmar
2.17 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Chad rank
131st
Myanmar rank
129th

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process over time

  • Chad
  • Myanmar
00.511.522.5200720122018

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 2.17 1=low to 5=high against 2.15 1=low to 5=high in Chad, a difference of 0.02 1=low to 5=high.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Myanmar ahead.

Chad ranks 131st and Myanmar ranks 129th of 156 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Myanmar Difference Ahead
2000s 2 1=low to 5=high 2.07 1=low to 5=high 0.07 1=low to 5=high Myanmar
2010s 2.16 1=low to 5=high 2.15 1=low to 5=high 0.0146 1=low to 5=high Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process, Chad or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 2.17 1=low to 5=high against 2.15 1=low to 5=high in Chad as of 2018.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process between Chad and Myanmar?
0.02 1=low to 5=high, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Myanmar?
6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Chad and Myanmar rank globally for logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process?
Chad ranks 131st and Myanmar ranks 129th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Myanmar: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/chad/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/chad/myanmar/">Chad vs Myanmar: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.