Congo vs Guyana: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process

Congo
2.3 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Guyana
2.3 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Congo rank
110th
Guyana rank
110th

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process over time

  • Congo
  • Guyana
0123200720142022

How they compare

Congo currently reports 2.3 1=low to 5=high against 2.3 1=low to 5=high in Guyana, a difference of 0 1=low to 5=high.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 110th and Guyana ranks 110th of 157 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Guyana Difference Ahead
2010s 1.92 1=low to 5=high 2.34 1=low to 5=high 0.4248 1=low to 5=high Guyana
2020s 2.3 1=low to 5=high 2.3 1=low to 5=high 0 1=low to 5=high

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process, Congo or Guyana?
Congo, at 2.3 1=low to 5=high against 2.3 1=low to 5=high in Guyana as of 2022.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process between Congo and Guyana?
0 1=low to 5=high, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guyana?
6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Congo and Guyana rank globally for logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process?
Congo ranks 110th and Guyana ranks 110th of 157 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Guyana: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/congo-rep/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/congo-rep/guyana/">Congo vs Guyana: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.