Cyprus vs Ecuador: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process

Cyprus
2.9 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Ecuador
2.8 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Cyprus rank
55th
Ecuador rank
58th

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process over time

  • Cyprus
  • Ecuador
0123200720142022

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 2.9 1=low to 5=high against 2.8 1=low to 5=high in Ecuador, a difference of 0.1 1=low to 5=high.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 55th and Ecuador ranks 58th of 156 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Ecuador Difference Ahead
2000s 2.77 1=low to 5=high 2.25 1=low to 5=high 0.52 1=low to 5=high Cyprus
2010s 3 1=low to 5=high 2.52 1=low to 5=high 0.4745 1=low to 5=high Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process, Cyprus or Ecuador?
Cyprus, at 2.9 1=low to 5=high against 2.8 1=low to 5=high in Ecuador as of 2022.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process between Cyprus and Ecuador?
0.1 1=low to 5=high, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Ecuador?
6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Cyprus and Ecuador rank globally for logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process?
Cyprus ranks 55th and Ecuador ranks 58th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Ecuador: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/cyprus/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/cyprus/ecuador/">Cyprus vs Ecuador: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.