Eritrea vs Senegal: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process

Eritrea
2.13 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Senegal
2.17 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Eritrea rank
132nd
Senegal rank
129th

Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process over time

  • Eritrea
  • Senegal
0123200720122018

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 2.17 1=low to 5=high against 2.13 1=low to 5=high in Eritrea, a difference of 0.04 1=low to 5=high.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 132nd and Senegal ranks 129th of 156 countries.

Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Senegal Difference Ahead
2000s 2.14 1=low to 5=high 2.38 1=low to 5=high 0.24 1=low to 5=high Senegal
2010s 1.86 1=low to 5=high 2.4 1=low to 5=high 0.538 1=low to 5=high Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process, Eritrea or Senegal?
Senegal, at 2.17 1=low to 5=high against 2.13 1=low to 5=high in Eritrea as of 2018.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process between Eritrea and Senegal?
0.04 1=low to 5=high, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Senegal?
6 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Eritrea and Senegal rank globally for logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process?
Eritrea ranks 132nd and Senegal ranks 129th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Senegal: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/eritrea/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-efficiency-of-customs-clearance-process-1-low-to-5-high/eritrea/senegal/">Eritrea vs Senegal: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.