Lower middle income vs Malaysia: Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process
Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process over time
- Lower middle income
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 3.3 1=low to 5=high against 2.38 1=low to 5=high in Lower middle income, a difference of 0.92 1=low to 5=high.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.4 times Lower middle income's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Lower middle income ranks 30th and Malaysia ranks 30th of 45 groups.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lower middle income | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.17 1=low to 5=high | 3.36 1=low to 5=high | 1.19 1=low to 5=high | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 2.3 1=low to 5=high | 3.16 1=low to 5=high | 0.8677 1=low to 5=high | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 2.38 1=low to 5=high | 3.3 1=low to 5=high | 0.925 1=low to 5=high | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process, Lower middle income or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 3.3 1=low to 5=high against 2.38 1=low to 5=high in Lower middle income as of 2022.
- What is the difference in logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process between Lower middle income and Malaysia?
- 0.92 1=low to 5=high, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lower middle income and Malaysia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do Lower middle income and Malaysia rank globally for logistics performance index: efficiency of customs clearance process?
- Lower middle income ranks 30th and Malaysia ranks 30th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Efficiency of customs clearance process (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.