Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Logistics performance index: Overall

Lithuania
3.4 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Sub-Saharan Africa
2.53 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Lithuania rank
37th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
33rd

Logistics performance index: Overall over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
01234200720142022

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 3.4 1=low to 5=high against 2.53 1=low to 5=high in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.87 1=low to 5=high.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.3 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 37th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 33rd of 156 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
2000s 2.78 1=low to 5=high 2.35 1=low to 5=high 0.4326 1=low to 5=high Lithuania
2010s 3.18 1=low to 5=high 2.45 1=low to 5=high 0.7301 1=low to 5=high Lithuania
2020s 3.4 1=low to 5=high 2.53 1=low to 5=high 0.8654 1=low to 5=high Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: overall, Lithuania or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Lithuania, at 3.4 1=low to 5=high against 2.53 1=low to 5=high in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2022.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: overall between Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0.87 1=low to 5=high, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa?
7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
How do Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for logistics performance index: overall?
Lithuania ranks 37th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 33rd of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Overall (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Logistics performance index: Overall. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-overall-1-low-to-5-high/lithuania/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-overall-1-low-to-5-high/lithuania/sub-saharan-africa/">Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Logistics performance index: Overall</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Overall (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

The Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on the efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report.