Belarus vs Ecuador: Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related

Belarus
2.7 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Ecuador
2.72 1=low to 5=high
in 2018
Belarus rank
72nd
Ecuador rank
69th

Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related over time

  • Belarus
  • Ecuador
0123200720142022

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2.72 1=low to 5=high against 2.7 1=low to 5=high in Belarus, a difference of 0.02 1=low to 5=high.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 72nd and Ecuador ranks 69th of 156 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Ecuador Difference Ahead
2000s 2.63 1=low to 5=high 2.36 1=low to 5=high 0.27 1=low to 5=high Belarus
2010s 2.47 1=low to 5=high 2.58 1=low to 5=high 0.1082 1=low to 5=high Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related, Belarus or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 2.72 1=low to 5=high against 2.7 1=low to 5=high in Belarus as of 2018.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related between Belarus and Ecuador?
0.02 1=low to 5=high, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related?
Belarus ranks 72nd and Ecuador ranks 69th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Ecuador: Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-quality-of-trade-and-transport-related-infrastructure-1-low/belarus/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-quality-of-trade-and-transport-related-infrastructure-1-low/belarus/ecuador/">Belarus vs Ecuador: Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.