East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Hong Kong: Logistics performance: Quality of trade
Logistics performance: Quality of trade over time
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 4 1=low to 5=high against 2.88 1=low to 5=high in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 1.12 1=low to 5=high.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.4 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 13th and Hong Kong ranks 14th of 47 groups.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.37 1=low to 5=high | 4.06 1=low to 5=high | 1.69 1=low to 5=high | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 2.59 1=low to 5=high | 4.03 1=low to 5=high | 1.44 1=low to 5=high | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 2.88 1=low to 5=high | 4 1=low to 5=high | 1.12 1=low to 5=high | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 4 1=low to 5=high against 2.88 1=low to 5=high in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2022.
- What is the difference in logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong?
- 1.12 1=low to 5=high, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Hong Kong rank globally for logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 13th and Hong Kong ranks 14th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.