East Asia & Pacific vs South Korea: Logistics performance: Quality of trade
Logistics performance: Quality of trade over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- South Korea
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 4.1 1=low to 5=high against 3.32 1=low to 5=high in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0.78 1=low to 5=high.
That makes South Korea's figure about 1.2 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 7th and South Korea ranks 9th of 47 groups.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.88 1=low to 5=high | 3.44 1=low to 5=high | 0.559 1=low to 5=high | South Korea |
| 2010s | 3.04 1=low to 5=high | 3.73 1=low to 5=high | 0.6936 1=low to 5=high | South Korea |
| 2020s | 3.32 1=low to 5=high | 4.1 1=low to 5=high | 0.7789 1=low to 5=high | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related, East Asia & Pacific or South Korea?
- South Korea, at 4.1 1=low to 5=high against 3.32 1=low to 5=high in East Asia & Pacific as of 2022.
- What is the difference in logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related between East Asia & Pacific and South Korea?
- 0.78 1=low to 5=high, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and South Korea?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and South Korea rank globally for logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 7th and South Korea ranks 9th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.