Haiti vs Libya: Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related

Haiti
1.8 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Libya
1.7 1=low to 5=high
in 2022
Haiti rank
153rd
Libya rank
155th

Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related over time

  • Haiti
  • Libya
00.511.522.5200720142022

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 1.8 1=low to 5=high against 1.7 1=low to 5=high in Libya, a difference of 0.1 1=low to 5=high.

That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.

Haiti ranks 153rd and Libya ranks 155th of 156 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 1 and Libya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Libya Difference Ahead
2010s 1.87 1=low to 5=high 2.1 1=low to 5=high 0.2311 1=low to 5=high Libya
2020s 1.8 1=low to 5=high 1.7 1=low to 5=high 0.1 1=low to 5=high Haiti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related, Haiti or Libya?
Haiti, at 1.8 1=low to 5=high against 1.7 1=low to 5=high in Libya as of 2022.
What is the difference in logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related between Haiti and Libya?
0.1 1=low to 5=high, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Libya?
6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Haiti and Libya rank globally for logistics performance index: quality of trade and transport-related?
Haiti ranks 153rd and Libya ranks 155th of 156 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB), published as Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Haiti vs Libya: Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related. Statizoid, drawing on Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-quality-of-trade-and-transport-related-infrastructure-1-low/haiti/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/logistics-performance-index-quality-of-trade-and-transport-related-infrastructure-1-low/haiti/libya/">Haiti vs Libya: Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Logistics performance index: Quality of trade and transport-related infrastructure (1=low to 5=high)
Unit
1=low to 5=high
Source
Connecting to Compete - Logistics Performance Index (LPI), World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
203 places, 1,362 data points, 2007–2022
Last refreshed

Data are from the Logistics Performance Index survey conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. Respondents evaluate eight countries on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The eight countries are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. The 2023 LPI survey was conducted from September 6 to November 5, 2022. It provided 4,090 country assessments by 652 logistics professionals in 115 countries in all World Bank regions. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are included in Appendix 5 of the 2023 LPI report available at: https://lpi.worldbank.org/report. Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.